Speech Quality Assessment
Chapter
First Online:
- 71Downloads
Abstract
The present book aims at developing a multi-method, “process-oriented” assessment approach for testing effects of varying speech transmission quality on information processing in human listeners. In addition to methods for conventional subjective speech quality assessment, this chapter introduces more recently employed behavioral and neurophysiological techniques and paradigms. Afterward, those different method classes are compared in view of several measurement criteria.
Keywords
Speech quality assessment 主观的评价 Absolute category rating (ACR) Mean opinion score (MOS) Comparison category rating (CCR) Comparison mean opinion score (CMOS) Degradation category rating (DCR) Degradation mean opinion score (DMOS) Reaction time paradigm Detection Discrimination Identification Psychophysiology Electroencephalography (EEG) Event-related brain potential (ERP) P3 component Oddball paradigm Objectivity Reliability Validity Sensitivity Diagnosticity IntrusivenessReferences
-
1.S. Möller,Quality Engineering: Qualität kommunikationstechnischer Systeme(Springer, Heidelberg, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
2.C.D. Wickens, Processing resources in attention, inVarieties of Attention, ed. by R. Parasuraman, D.R. Davies (Academic Press, New York, 1984), pp. 63–102Google Scholar
-
3.E. Donchin, A.F. Kramer, C.D. Wickens, Applications of event-related brain potentials to problems in engineering psychology, inPsychophysiology: Systems, Processes, and Applications, 3rd edn. ed. by M.G.H. Coles, E. Donchin, S.W. Porges (Guilford Press, New York, 1986), pp. 702–718Google Scholar
-
4.R.D. O’Donnell, F.T. Eggemeier, Workload assessment methodology, inHandbook of Perception and Human Performance: Cognitive Processes and Performance, vol. 2, ed. by K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J.P. Thomas (Wiley, New York, 1986), pp. 42.1–42.49Google Scholar
-
5.A.F. Kramer, Physiological metrics of mental workload: a review of recent progress, inMultiple-Task Performance, ed. by D.L. Damos (Taylor & Francis, London, 1991), pp. 279–328Google Scholar
-
6.D. Manzey,Ergebnisse und Anwendungen der Psychophysiologie. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, ed. by F. Rösler (Hogrefe, Göttingen, 1998), Themenbereich C, Theorie und Forschung. Serie I, Biologische Psychologie; Bd. 5, pp. 799–864Google Scholar
-
7.M.M. Bradley, P.J. Lang,Emotion and Motivation, ed. by J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G. Berntson (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007), pp. 581–607Google Scholar
-
8.S. Möller,Assessment and Prediction of Speech Quality in Telecommunications(Springer, Boston, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
9.U. Jekosch,Voice and Speech Quality Perception: Assessment and Evaluation. Signals and Communication Technology (Springer, Berlin, 2005)Google Scholar
-
10.A. Raake,Speech Quality of VoIP: Assessment and Prediction(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
11.N. Côté,Integral and Diagnostic Intrusive Prediction of Speech Quality, ser. T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011)Google Scholar
-
12.M. Wältermann,Dimension-based Quality Modeling of Transmitted Speech. T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services (Springer, Heidelberg, 2013)Google Scholar
-
13.S. Möller, R. Heusdens, Objective estimation of speech quality for communication systems. Proc. IEEE101(9), 1955–1967 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
14.ITU-T Recommendation P.800,Methods for Subjective Determination of Transmission Quality(International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Geneva, 1996)Google Scholar
-
15.ITU-T Recommendation P.830,Subjective Performance Assessment of Telephone-Band and Wideband Digital Codecs(International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Geneva, 1996)Google Scholar
-
16.ITU-T Recommendation P.805,Subjective Evaluation of Conversational Quality(International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Geneva, 2007)Google Scholar
-
17.A. Raake, S. Egger, Quality and quality of experience, inQuality of Experience, ed. by S. Möller, A. Raake (Springer, Cham, 2014), pp. 11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
18.T. Hoßfeld, P.E. Heegaard, M. Varela, S. Möller, QoE beyond the MOS: an in-depth look at QoE via better metrics and their relation to MOS. Quality User Exp.1(1), 2 (2016)Google Scholar
-
19.P. Le Callet, S. Möller, A. Perkis (eds.), Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience, European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services (COST Action IC 1003), Version 1.2 (2013)Google Scholar
-
20.S. Zieliński, F. Rumsey, S. Bech, On some biases encountered in modern audio quality listening tests – a review. J. Audio Eng. Soc.56(6), 427–451 (2008)Google Scholar
-
21.M. Barreda-Ángeles, R. Pépion, E. Bosc, P. Le Callet, A. Pereda-Baños, Exploring the effects of 3D visual discomfort on viewers’ emotions, in2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)(IEEE, Paris, 2014), pp. 753–757Google Scholar
-
22.S. Uhrig, S. Möller, D.M. Behne, U.P. Svensson, A. Perkis, Testing a quality of experience (QoE) model of loudspeaker-based spatial speech reproduction, in2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)(IEEE, Athlone, 2020), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
-
23.A.F. Sanders,Elements of Human Performance: Reaction Processes and Attention in Human Skill(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 1998)Google Scholar
-
24.C.D. Wickens, J.G. Hollands, S. Banbury, R. Parasuraman,Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 4th edn. (Psychology Press, New York, 2013)Google Scholar
-
25.R.W. Proctor, T. Van Zandt,Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems, 3rd edn. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018)Google Scholar
-
26.D.E. Meyer, A.M. Osman, D.E. Irwin, S. Yantis, Modern mental chronometry. Biol. Psychol.26(1–3), 3–67 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
27.S.A. Hillyard, M. Kutas, Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annu. Rev. Psychol.34(1), 33–61 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
28.M.G.H. Coles, H.G.O.M. Smid, M.K. Scheffers, L.J. Otten, Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing, inElectrophysiology of Mind: Event-related Brain Potentials and Cognition. Oxford Psychology Series, No. 25. (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995), pp. 86–131Google Scholar
-
29.M.I. Posner, Timing the brain: mental chronometry as a tool in neuroscience. PLoS Biol.3(2), e51 (2005)Google Scholar
-
30.D.E. Linden, What, When, Where in the Brain? Exploring mental chronometry with brain imaging and electrophysiology. Rev. Neurosci.18(2) (2007)Google Scholar
-
31.F.C. Donders, Die Schnelligkeit psychischer Processe. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin35, 657–681 (1868)Google Scholar
-
32.S. Sternberg, The discovery of processing stages: extensions of donders’ method. Acta Psychol.30, 276–315 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
33.D.D. Salvucci, Multitasking, inThe Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Engineering由李J.D.患儿,a Kirlik(牛津大学公关ess, Oxford, 2013), pp. 57–67Google Scholar
-
34.S. Arndt, J.-N. Antons, R. Schleicher, S. Möller, G. Curio, Using electroencephalography to measure perceived video quality. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Sign. Proces.8(3), 366–376 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
35.J.-N. Antons, R. Schleicher, S. Arndt, S. Möller, A.K. Porbadnigk, G. Curio, Analyzing speech quality perception using electroencephalography. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Sign. Proces.6(6), 721–731 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
36.A.K. Porbadnigk, M.S. Treder, B. Blankertz, J.-N. Antons, R. Schleicher, S. Möller, G. Curio, K.-R. Müller, Single-trial analysis of the neural correlates of speech quality perception. J. Neural Eng.10(5), 056003 (2013)Google Scholar
-
37.D.A. Pizzagalli, Electroencephalography and high-density electrophysiological source localization, inHandbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd edn. ed. by J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G. Berntson (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007), pp. 56–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
38.S.J. Luck, E.S. Kappenman, Electroencephalography and event-related brain potentials, inHandbook of Psychophysiology, 4th edn. ed. by J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G.G. Berntson (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016), pp. 74–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
39.M.X. Cohen, Where does EEG come from and what does it mean? Trends Neurosci.40(4), 208–218 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
40.R. Caton, The electric currents of the brain. Br. Med. J.2(765), 278 (1875)Google Scholar
-
41.H. Berger, Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten87(1), 527–570 (1929)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
42.S. Geuter, M.A. Lindquist, T.D. Wager, Fundamentals of functional neuroimaging, inHandbook of Psychophysiology, 4th edn. ed. by J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G.G. Berntson (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016), pp. 41–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
43.A.F. Jackson, D.J. Bolger, The neurophysiological bases of EEG and EEG measurement: a review for the rest of us: neurophysiological bases of EEG. Psychophysiology51(11), 1061–1071 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
44.M.R. Nuwer, G. Comi, R. Emerson, A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen, J.-M. Guérit, H. Hinrichs, A. Ikeda, F. Jose, C. Luccas, P. Rappelsburger, IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.106(3), 259–261 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
45.G.H. Klem, h . Luders第三世碧玉,c . Elger ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. the international federation of clinical neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl.52, 3–6 (1999)Google Scholar
-
46.T.F. Münte, T.P. Urbach, E. Düzel, M. Kutas, Chapter 7: event-related brain potentials in the study of human cognition and neuropsychology, inHandbook of Neuropsychology: Sect 1: Introduction, Sect 2: Attention, vol. 1, 2nd edn. Handbook of Neuropsychology, ed. by F. Boller, J. Grafman, G. Rizzolatti (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 2000), pp. 139–235Google Scholar
-
47.M. Fabiani, G. Gratton, K.D. Federmeier, Event-related brain potentials: methods, theory, and applications, inHandbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd edn., ed. by J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G. Berntson (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007), pp. 85–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
48.S.J. Luck,An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique, 2nd edn. (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014)Google Scholar
-
49.M.X. Cohen,Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice. Issues in Clinical and Cognitive Neuropsychology (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014)Google Scholar
-
50.C.S. Herrmann, S. Rach, J. Vosskuhl, D. Strüber, Time–frequency analysis of event-related potentials: a brief tutorial. Brain Topogr.27(4), 438–450 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
51.s . Uhrig a . Perkis D.M. Behne, P3反映peech quality change? Controlling for auditory evoked activity in event-related brain potential (ERP) waveforms, in2019 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)(IEEE, San Diego, 2019), pp. 152–1523Google Scholar
-
52.W. Klimesch, P. Sauseng, S. Hanslmayr, W. Gruber, R. Freunberger, Event-related phase reorganization may explain evoked neural dynamics. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.31(7), 1003–1016 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
53.P. Sauseng, W. Klimesch, W. Gruber, S. Hanslmayr, R. Freunberger, M. Doppelmayr, Are event-related potential components generated by phase resetting of brain oscillations? A critical discussion. Neuroscience146(4), 1435–1444 (2007)Google Scholar
-
54.M.A. Boksem, T.F. Meijman, M.M. Lorist, Effects of mental fatigue on attention: an ERP study. Cogn. Brain Res.25(1), 107–116 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
55.R. Tibon, D.A. Levy, Striking a balance: analyzing unbalanced event-related potential data. Front. Psychol.6, 555 (2015)Google Scholar
-
56.Z. Šidák, Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.62(318), 626–633 (1967)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
-
57.S. Holm, A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat.6(2), 65–70 (1979)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
-
58.S.J. Luck, N. Gaspelin, How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn’t). Psychophysiology54(1), 146–157 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
59.F. Pulvermüller, Y. Shtyrov, Language outside the focus of attention: the mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Prog. Neurobiol.79(1), 49–71 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
60.C. Alain, K. Tremblay, The role of event-related brain potentials in assessing central auditory processing. J. Am. Acad. Audiol.18(7), 573–589 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
61.B.A. Martin, K.L. Tremblay, P. Korczak, Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear.29(3), 285–313 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
62.J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G.G. Berntson, Strong inference in psychophysiological science, inHandbook of Psychophysiology, 4th edn., ed. by J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G.G. Berntson (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016), pp. 3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
63.E. Donchin, W. Ritter, W.C. McCallum, Cognitive psychophysiology: the endogenous components of the ERP, inEvent-Related Brain Potentials in Man. Behavioral Biology Series, ed. by E. Callaway, P. Tueting, S.H. Koslow (Academic Press, New York, 1978), pp. 349–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
64.A. Kok, Internal and external control: a two-factor model of amplitude change of event-related potentials. Acta Psychol.74(2–3), 213–236 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
65.A. Kok, Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: a review and synthesis. Biol. Psychol.45(1–3), 19–56 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
66.F. Musiek, J.E. Gonzalez, J.A. Baran, Auditory brainstem response: differential diagnosis, inHandbook of Clinical Audiology, 7th ed., ed. by J. Katz, M. Chasin, K.M. English, L.J. Hood, K.L. Tillery (Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, 2015), pp. 231–248Google Scholar
-
67.K. Tremblay, C. Clinard, Cortical auditory-evoked potentials, inHandbook of Clinical Audiology, 7th edn., ed. by J. Katz, M. Chasin, K.M. English, L.J. Hood, K.L. Tillery (Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, 2015), pp. 337–355Google Scholar
-
68.M.I. Garrido, J.M. Kilner, K.E. Stephan, K.J. Friston, The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin. Neurophysiol.120(3), 453 - 463 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
69.R. Näätänen, K. Kreegipuu, The mismatch negativity (MMN), inThe Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components. Oxford Library of Psychology, ed. by S.J. Luck, E.S. Kappenman (Oxford University Press, New York, 2011)Google Scholar
-
70.J. Polich, Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b, inDetection of Change, ed. by J. Polich (Springer, Boston, 2003), pp. 83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
71.J. Polich, J.R. Criado, Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. Int. J. Psychophysiol.60(2), 172–185 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
72.J. Polich, Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol.118(10), 2128–2148 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
73.J. Polich, Neuropsychology of P300, inThe Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components. Oxford Library of Psychology, ed. by S.J. Luck, E.S. Kappenman (Oxford University Press, New York, 2012), pp. 159–188Google Scholar
-
74.D.E.J. Linden, The P300: where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us? The Neuroscientist11(6), 563–576 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
75.E.N. Sokolov, Higher nervous functions: the orienting reflex. Annu. Rev. Physiol.25(1), 545–580 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
76.E.N. Sokolov, J.A. Spinks, R. Näätänen, H. Lyytinen,信息的定向反应工艺ng(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, 2002)Google Scholar
-
77.E. Donchin, Surprise!? Surprise? Psychophysiology18(5), 493–513 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
78.E. Donchin, M.G.H. Coles, Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav. Brain Sci.11(03), 357 (1988)Google Scholar
-
79.A. Kok, On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology38(3), 557–577 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
80.R. Verleger, P. Jaśkowski, E. Wascher, Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. J. Psychophysiol.19(3), 165–181 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
81.C.C. Duncan, R.J. Barry, J.F. Connolly, C. Fischer, P.T. Michie, R. Näätänen, J. Polich, I. Reinvang, C.V. Petten, Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clin. Neurophysiol.120(11), 1883–1908 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
82.R.W. Backs, W. Boucsein (eds.),Engineering Psychophysiology: Issues and Applications(Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, 2000)Google Scholar
-
83.A.F. Kramer, R. Parasuraman, Neuroergonomics: application of neuroscience to human factors, inHandbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd edn., ed. by J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G. Berntson (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 704–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
84.R. Fazel-Rezai, B.Z. Allison, C. Guger, E.W. Sellers, S.C. Kleih, A. Kübler, P300 brain computer interface: current challenges and emerging trends. Front. Neuroeng.5, 14 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
85.M.D. Rugg, M.G.H. Coles (eds.),Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition. Oxford psychology Series Oxford (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995), p. 25Google Scholar
-
86.T.C. Handy (ed.),Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook(MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005)Google Scholar
-
87.E.S. Kappenman, S.J. Luck (eds.),The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components, 1st edn. (Oxford University Press, Cambridge, 2011)Google Scholar
-
88.U. Engelke, D.P. Darcy, G.H. Mulliken, S. Bosse, M.G. Martini, S. Arndt, J.-N. Antons, K.Y. Chan, N. Ramzan, K. Brunnström, Psychophysiology-based QoE assessment: a survey. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Sign. Proces.11(1), 6–21 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
89.K. Hugdahl,Psychophysiology: The Mind-Body Perspective. Perspectives in Cognitive Neuroscience (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
-
90.J.L. Andreassi,Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physiological Response, 5th edn. (Psychology Press, New York, 2007)Google Scholar
-
91.J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G.G. Berntson (eds.),Handbook of Psychophysiology, 4th edn. (University Press, Cambridge, 2016)Google Scholar
-
92.J.T. Cacioppo, S.L. Crites, W.L. Gardner, G.G. Berntson, Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorizations: I. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of trait negativity and extremity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.67(1), 115–125 (1994)Google Scholar
-
93.A.M. Proverbio, A. Zani, Electromagnetic manifestations of mind and brain, inThe Cognitive Electrophysiology of Mind and Brain, ed. by A. Zani, A.M. Proverbio, M.I. Posner (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003), pp. 13–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
94.L.A. Liikkanen, H. Tiitinen, P. Alku, S. Leino, S. Yrttiaho, P.J. May, The right-hemispheric auditory cortex in humans is sensitive to degraded speech sounds. NeuroReport18(6), 601–605 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
95.I. Miettinen, H. Tiitinen, P. Alku, P.J. May, Sensitivity of the human auditory cortex to acoustic degradation of speech and non-speech sounds. BMC Neurosci.11(1), 24 (2010)Google Scholar
-
96.J.-N. Antons, R. Schleicher, S. Arndt, S. Möller, G. Curio, Too tired for calling? A physiological measure of fatigue caused by bandwidth limitations, in2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience. (IEEE, Melbourne, 2012), pp. 63–67Google Scholar
-
97.J.-N. Antons, F. Köster, S. Arndt, S. Möller, R. Schleicher, Changes of vigilance caused by varying bit rate conditions, in2013 Fifth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)(IEEE, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, 2013), pp. 148–151Google Scholar
-
98.S. Arndt, J.-N. Antons, R. Gupta, K. ur Rehman Laghari, R. Schleicher, S. Möller, T. H. Falk, The effects of text-to-speech system quality on emotional states and frontal alpha band power, in2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)(IEEE, San Diego, 2013), pp. 489–492Google Scholar
-
99.J.-N. Antons,Neural Correlates of Quality Perception for Complex Speech Signals. T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services (Springer, Cham, 2015)Google Scholar
-
100.S. Arndt,Neural Correlates of Quality During Perception of Audiovisual Stimuli. T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services (Springer, Singapore, 2016)Google Scholar
-
101.S. Arndt, J.-N. Antons, R. Schleicher, S. Möller, Using electroencephalography to analyze sleepiness due to low-quality audiovisual stimuli. Signal Process. Image Commun.42, 120–129 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
102.A.K. Porbadnigk, J.-N. Antons, B. Blankertz, M.S. Treder, R. Schleicher, S. Möller, G. Curio, Using ERPs for assessing the (sub) conscious perception of noise, inProceeding of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)(IEEE, Piscataway, 2010), pp. 2690–2693Google Scholar
-
103.S. Arndt, J.-N. Antons, R. Gupta, K. ur Rehman Laghari, R. Schleicher, S. Möller, T.H. Falk, Subjective quality ratings and physiological correlates of synthesized speech, in2013 Fifth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)(IEEE, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, 2013), pp. 152–157Google Scholar
-
104.J.-N. Antons, A.K. Porbadnigk, R. Schleicher, B. Blankertz, S. Möller, G. Curio, Subjective listening tests and neural correlates of speech degradation in case of signal-correlated noise, inAudio Engineering Society (AES) 129th Convention(Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, 2010), pp. 1–4Google Scholar
-
105.A.K. Porbadnigk, J.-N. Antons, M.S. Treder, B. Blankertz, R. Schleicher, S. Möller, G. Curio, ERP assessment of word processing under broadcast bit rate limitations. Neurosci. Lett.500, e26–e27 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
106.J.-N. Antons, K.u.R. Laghari, S. Arndt, R. Schleicher, S. Möller, D. O’Shaughnessy, T.H. Falk, Cognitive, affective, and experience correlates of speech quality perception in complex listening conditions, in2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing(IEEE, Vancouver, 2013), pp. 3672–3676Google Scholar
-
107.S. Arndt, K. Brunnström, E. Cheng, U. Engelke, S. Möller, J.-N. Antons, Review on using physiology in quality of experience. Elect. Imag.2016(16), 1–9 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
108.ITU-T Recommendation P.810,Modulated Noise Reference Unit (MNRU). (International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Geneva, 1996)Google Scholar
-
109.ITU-T Recommendation G.722.2,Wideband Coding of Speech at Around 16 kbit/s Using Adaptive Multi-Rate Wideband (AMR-WB)(International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, 2003)Google Scholar
-
110.M. Wältermann, A. Raake, S. Möller, Quality dimensions of narrowband and wideband speech transmission. Acta Acust. United Acust.96(6), 1090–1103 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
111.S.S. Stevens, On the theory of scales of measurement. Science103(2684), 677–680 (1946)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
112.J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, Inferring psychological significance from physiological signals. Am. Psychol.45(1), 16–28 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
113.K.B. Walhovd, A.M. Fjell, One-year test–retest reliability of auditory ERPs in young and old adults. Int. J. Psychophysiol.46(1), 29–40 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
114.J.T. Cacioppo, S.L. Crites, W.L. Gardner, Attitudes to the right: evaluative processing is associated with lateralized late positive event-related brain potentials. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull.22(12), 1205–1219 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
©作者(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022